|
"I thought there was our
case and maybe a few others like it. But last fall I went to a
conference at Northwestern University in Illinois and found 30
others who were innocent and got released. I was shocked! And
there are others. Who knows how many didn't get out because they
couldn't get the legal help or had no outside support?"
-- Wilbert Lee,
who spent 12 years on death row for a double murder he did not
commit. He was pardoned by Florida's governor after another man
confessed to the killings, The Militant, 3/29/1999.

|
Death Penalty Facts
To download a
Fact Sheet in PDF format, click
here.
Death Penalty Facts
Innocent
people have been convicted and
sentenced to death.
In 1974, New
Mexico sentenced to death four innocent men, Thomas Gladis,
Ronald Keine, Clarence Smith and Richard Greer, based on false
witness testimony and police misconduct. Since 1973, 119
innocent men and women have been released from death rows across
the country (Northwestern University, DP Information Center).
Researchers Radelet and Bedau found 23 cases since 1900 where
innocent people were executed (In Spite of Innocence, Northeastern University Press,
1992).
[back]
The death penalty is applied
unfairly and arbitrarily.
In 1999, the
American Bar Association, a conservative group of 400,000
lawyers, reiterated its call for a moratorium on executions
because of serious concern with racial disparity in death
sentences and the failure to provide adequate counsel and
resources to capital defendants. In January 2000, Republican
Governor George Ryan called for a moratorium on executions in
the state of Illinois and in May 2002 Governor Paris Glendening
did the same in Maryland. In January 2003, Governor Ryan
pardoned four men and commuted the sentences of 167 death row
inmates to life without parole or less because he found the
death penalty process "arbitrary and capricious and therefore
immoral". The men currently on New Mexico's death row could not
afford to hire their own lawyers. In January 2002, Republican
Governor Gary Johnson declared New Mexico's death penalty to be
bad public policy because it was not applied fairly and innocent
people could be executed.
[back]
Scientific research indicates
capital punishment is not a deterrent to homicide or other
violent crimes.
A recent
New York Times
survey found states without the death penalty have lower
homicide rates than states with the death penalty. Average
murder rates in 1999 were 5.5 per 100,000 in death penalty
states and only 3.6 in non-death penalty states. Statistics
indicated the regions of the country that use the death penalty
the least are the safest for police. Police are most in danger
in the South, where in 2001, 79% of all executions occurred. A
1995 Hart Research Associates poll of police chiefs showed
police chiefs rank the death penalty
last as
a way of reducing violent crime -- behind curbing drug use, more
police officers, more jobs and reducing guns. 80% of experts
from a 1995 survey of the American Society of Criminology,
Academy of Criminal Justice Science and the Law and Society
Association believe research fails to show any deterrence value
in the death penalty.
[back]
The death penalty is more expensive
than life imprisonment.
A 1993 Duke
University study showed that the death penalty in North Carolina
costs 2.16 million dollars more per execution than a non-death
penalty murder trial. Research in other states indicates
executions are three to six times more costly than life
imprisonment. In 1999, the New Mexico State Public Defender
Department estimated the state would save $1 to 2.5 million
dollars per year on Public Defender costs alone if the death
penalty was replaced with an alternative sentence.
[back]
Many family members of murder
victims don't want the death penalty -- and actively oppose it.
Groups such as
Murder Victims Families for Reconciliation have been created to
provide support to the growing number of families of murder
victims who seek solutions other than the death penalty.
Michelle Giger, whose father was murdered in Santa Rosa, NM,
speaks out personally before the legislature and the public in
favor of healing and putting an end to the cycle of violence.
Connie Fisher of Galisteo, NM, who lost her brother in the
September 11th attacks on the World Trade Center states, "the
horror of murder isn't healed by another murder". They join many
survivors who believe money spent on capital punishment should,
instead, be directed towards long-term counseling and financial
assistance for families of people who are murdered.
[back]
The
U.S. is the only Western country
that continues to use capital punishment.
Since the U.S.
reinstated the death penalty in 1976, over 40 countries have
abolished it. In December 1998, the European Parliament called
for immediate and global abolition of the death penalty, with
special notice to the U.S. to abandon it. Abolition is a
condition for acceptance into the Council of Europe, leading
countries such as Russia and Turkey to abolish the death
penalty. Recently, South Africa, Canada, France and Germany have
all ruled against extraditing prisoners to the U.S. if death
sentences would be sought. The World Court, in a unanimous
decision reached on February 5, 2003, ruled that the U.S. must
delay the execution of three Mexican citizens while it
investigates the cases of all 51 Mexicans on death row in the
U.S. The Mexican government asserts that the U.S. has violated
the Vienna Convention by not informing its citizens that they
have the right to contact their consulate when arrested. The
death penalty has long been a source of tension between the U.S.
and countries that oppose capital punishment.
[back]
The vast majority of religions and
faith groups oppose the death penalty.
Most major
denominations -- Roman Catholic, Presbyterian, Lutheran,
Methodist, Unitarian, Quaker, Jewish and many others -- maintain
strong statements condemning the use of the death penalty. Pope
John Paul II has repeatedly called for abolition of the death
penalty and New Mexico's Catholic Bishops, along with the NM
Catholic Conference and NM Conference of Churches, have taken
similar stands. Many Jewish, Protestant, Buddhist and other
faith group leaders support alternatives to the death penalty
and encourage their congregations to pray and study about this
issue.
[back]
Public opinion supports alternatives
to the death penalty.
A statewide,
February 2003 poll of likely New Mexican voters showed that 58%
support replacing the death penalty with life without parole
plus restitution to victims' families. Only 36% of New Mexicans
continue to support the death penalty when this alternative is
offered. These results are similar to previous state and
national polls. For example, an October 2002 poll, commissioned
by The New
Mexican newspaper, discovered that support for the
death penalty drops from 66% to 48% when a sentence of life
without the possibility of parole is available. A national
survey, conducted by Peter D. Hart Research Associates, Inc. in
March 2001, found that support for capital punishment declined
from 60% to 38% when a life sentence plus restitution was
offered. Issues that raised doubts about use of the death
penalty included danger of executing innocent people, racism and
regional issues in application, and failure of the penalty as a
deterrent to crime.
[back]
|